Consumer sentiment just hit its lowest level in 74 years. Restaurants can’t find dishwashers. And workers are dropping out of the labor force at the fastest pace in years. These three stories are not separate — they are the same story about a consumer credit environment that is deteriorating faster than the headline numbers suggest.
Three stories crossed the wire this week that, read individually, look like separate economic data points. Read together, they describe a single deteriorating picture of the US consumer — one that has direct implications for everyone managing a consumer lending book heading into Q2 and Q3.
The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index plummeted to 47.6 in April — the lowest reading in the survey’s 74-year history. It is below every prior trough on record, including during the 2008 financial crisis, the early 1980s recession, and the pandemic’s opening months. The 11% single-month decline from March’s 53.3 was itself the largest monthly drop in years.
The driver is unambiguous. Survey director Joanne Hsu said open-ended comments showed “many consumers blame the Iran conflict for unfavorable changes to the economy.” The deterioration was uniform across age, income, and political affiliation — every component of the index fell. Approximately two-thirds of interviews were conducted before the April 7 ceasefire announcement, meaning the data captures peak war-anxiety rather than any subsequent relief.
The inflation expectations component is the number that should concern lenders most. Year-ahead inflation expectations surged from 3.8% in March to 4.8% in April — a full percentage point jump in a single month and the largest one-month increase in the survey’s history. Five-year inflation expectations also rose, to 3.4%. Consumers are not just worried about current prices — they are now pricing in persistent inflation pressure well into the future.
This matters for consumer lending because sentiment and spending behavior are tightly correlated — with a lag. When consumers feel this pessimistic, they pull back on discretionary purchases, delay major credit decisions, and prioritize debt service over new borrowing. The April sentiment collapse will show up in Q2 origination pipeline softness and Q3 loan performance data. It will not show up in this month’s credit bureau pulls.
The Wall Street Journal this week reported on a labor shortage that has become an operational crisis for the restaurant industry: the near-complete unavailability of entry-level kitchen workers. Dishwashers, prep cooks, and back-of-house staff — the lowest-paid, hardest-to-fill positions in hospitality — have become effectively unrecrutable in many markets.
The data behind the headline is stark. Full-service restaurant employment remains more than 200,000 jobs below pre-pandemic levels as of February 2026. Restaurants and bars lost approximately 30,000 jobs in February on a seasonally-adjusted basis — the largest monthly drop since February 2025. The National Restaurant Association reports that 78% of restaurants entered 2026 understaffed, with an average of 21 days to fill open positions and a 75% annual turnover rate.
The root cause is structural, not cyclical. The restaurant and food service industry has historically relied on immigrant labor for back-of-house and entry-level positions. In food preparation and serving jobs, the foreign-born share of workers rose from roughly 22% in 2003 to over 25% by 2024. The Trump administration’s immigration crackdown has removed approximately 1 million foreign-born workers from the US labor force since its March 2025 peak — 596,000 of those between January and February 2026 alone. Those workers are not being replaced by US-born workers. Labor force participation for US-born workers actually declined from 61.4% to 61.0% over the same period, according to National Foundation for American Policy analysis of BLS data.
The dishwasher shortage is not a restaurant story. It is a leading indicator. Restaurants are the most labor-sensitive sector in the consumer economy — they hire first when conditions improve and cut first when conditions deteriorate. They are also the sector Goldman Sachs identified as absorbing the sharpest job losses from the Iran war oil shock: approximately 5,000 jobs per month in leisure and hospitality. A sector that was already structurally understaffed is now facing a demand shock on top of a supply shock.
The third story is the one that ties the others together. The Wall Street Journal reported this week on the accelerating departure of workers from the US labor force entirely — not people who are unemployed and looking, but people who have stopped looking altogether.
The scale is significant. The civilian labor force contracted from 128.69 million in March 2025 to 123.84 million in March 2026 — a loss of nearly 5 million people in 12 months. The labor force participation rate stands at 61.9%, the lowest since November 2021. Among workers with at least a bachelor’s degree, participation fell to a record low of 71.5% in March — the lowest reading in data going back to 1992.
Three forces are driving the exit. First, immigration: net migration to the US has likely turned negative for the first time in 50 years, removing workers from both the supply of labor and the local consumer spending base. Second, demographics: aging is pulling older workers out of the labor force faster than younger workers are entering it. Third, discouraged workers: people who have given up searching after the “low-hire, low-fire” frozen job market provided no opportunities. The 6 million people who want a job but aren’t counted as unemployed represent a shadow labor force of financially stressed households — potential borrowers who are invisible in the headline unemployment rate but fully visible in credit stress data.
These three stories connect to a single underwriting reality. The consumers who are most pessimistic, most likely to be working in understaffed service sector jobs, and most likely to have dropped out of active job searching are the same consumers: hourly workers, near-prime borrowers, younger adults, and workers in food service and hospitality. They are not the borrowers causing stress in your portfolio today. They are the borrowers who will be causing stress in your portfolio in 90 days.
Record-low consumer sentiment, a frozen service sector labor market, and a shrinking labor force are not independent macro conditions. They are compounding pressures on the same borrower segment — the one that was already most exposed to the Iran war energy shock, already earning real wages that had just gone negative, and already carrying the thinnest savings buffers. The Q2 and Q3 delinquency data will confirm what the current data already shows. The lenders who act on it now are the ones who won’t be reacting to it later.
The Lending Pulse delivers weekly intelligence for consumer lending executives — macro signals, regulatory updates, earnings decoded, and company moves. Start your free month — no credit card required.
Start free month →